It's been pretty quiet on this list, so I thought I'd start a
conversation to see if the list is working. Anyone doing any
interesting Self work?
I sidelined my VNC client in Self for a bit due to getting busy in my
day job but plan to get back to it soon and finish it off. It's pretty
close. The missing part is mostly key handling.
I'd like to tidy up my Android patches too and get them submitted so
at least Intel android would work out of the box.
What do people feel would make Self more viable as a fun project to hack on?
--
http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz
I'm not sure what to do with this:
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Nabble <no-reply(a)nabble.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 at 12:53
Subject: Nabble forum scheduled for deletion
To: <spdegabrielle(a)gmail.com>
Dear Nabble user,
The forum listed below is inactive and has been scheduled for deletion in
10 days.
To prevent this forum from being deleted, visit the forum and follow the
instructions.
http://forum.selflanguage.org/
If this forum is deleted, your posts in this forum will be deleted.
You can see your posts here:
http://forum.selflanguage.org/template/NamlServlet.jtp?
macro=user_nodes&user=394769
** For more information, see:
http://n2.nabble.com/help/Answer.jtp?id=53
Regards,
The Nabble team
What is 'Bayesian Korz' ?
Would it allow you to have an object in both Platform and 'graphical
interface'?
Kind Regards,
Stephen
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 at 08:05, David Ungar ungar(a)me.com [self-interest] <
self-interest(a)yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> You need Bayesian Korz, or a simulation of it. No one-dimensional,
> Aristotelian framework will be great. :)
>
> - David (from iPad, typos likely)
>
>
> On Feb 1, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Russell Allen mail(a)russell-allen.com
> [self-interest] <self-interest(a)yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> The current organisation of objects in 'globals' into categories bears all
> the hallmarks of organic growth, and I've found it a bit hard to work out
> where things are. (There is also scope for cleanups of some of the more
> unused objects but we'll look at that later)
>
> I've added a branch to the GitHub sources 'reorg' and have built a trial
> snapshot with an attempt at something more 'discoverable'.
>
> I'd love feedback; either build the version in the reorg branch or
> download a prebuilt snapshot at:
>
> http://files.selflanguage.org/temp/reorg.snap
>
> The story about the top level is basically:
>
> applications - anything outside the main Self release, eg webservers etc
> core - core language objects such as numbers, collections, booleans etc
> graphical interface - code for morphic, ui1 etc
> platform - objects to interface with the underlying platform (eg OS X etc)
> system - objects relating to the Self system, such as the system logger,
> the transporter, reflection facilities etc
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Cheers, Russell
>
>
>
The current organisation of objects in 'globals' into categories bears all the hallmarks of organic growth, and I've found it a bit hard to work out where things are. (There is also scope for cleanups of some of the more unused objects but we'll look at that later)
I've added a branch to the GitHub sources 'reorg' and have built a trial snapshot with an attempt at something more 'discoverable'.
I'd love feedback; either build the version in the reorg branch or download a prebuilt snapshot at:
http://files.selflanguage.org/temp/reorg.snap
The story about the top level is basically:
applications - anything outside the main Self release, eg webservers etc
core - core language objects such as numbers, collections, booleans etc
graphical interface - code for morphic, ui1 etc
platform - objects to interface with the underlying platform (eg OS X etc)
system - objects relating to the Self system, such as the system logger, the transporter, reflection facilities etc
Any suggestions?
Cheers, Russell