Jecel Assumpcao Jr wrote:
Hi Jecel!

On Monday 15 March 2004 19:32, Albertina Lourenci wrote:
> Well,  in this case we have no graphical wall!

It is an example of a textual notation, not a graphical one.

> Of course for graphical designers this makes no sense!

My point exactly.

> What I understand by graphical syntax is something like
> the GUI, the outliner and so on! In this case you also
> have true graphical objects.

I am typing this in an application running in a GUI, yet can't use it to
send you an example of a graphical notation. The outliner only allows
you to type text in it to define a method, even though it is a very
nice graphical notation of an object.

> Hence the difference is not it is only interactive. Indeed
> it has different functionality from the literal syntax.
> It is something like three dimensional collaborative
> architecture and bidimensional collaborative architecture.

Right.

And this confirms my viewpoints there is no one-to-one
mapping. Different functionalities are involved.
 

> > Even though the three versions of the wall object are equivalent in
> > theory, in practice it is more fun to deal with the graphical
> > version.
>
> I see no equivalence! Only if you make a reductionist effort or
> a rough mapping from one to the other. For a designer this makes
> no sense!

 

It is not a rough mapping - it is an exact mapping which an automatic
tool can use to translate from one notation to the other.

I see! It is like free-hand sketch and then technical drawing!
 

But you are the one who said:

# I miss the point here. Semiotically speaking there may be different
# forms for the same content. What's the problem with this? For me the
# problem is when there is no correspondence between the two different
# forms. This is exactly what happens when one tries to map domain model
# and architecture into programming languages.

Sure! I believe the conundrum might be solved if one builds programming
languages inspired by what happens in domain model and architectures.
And yet the programming language has its own development!
 

I showed you three different forms for the same content, and hope you
now see the problem with this. In practice, some forms are more
convenient than others.

I see. Thank you for the detailed explanation.
Best wishes
Albertina
 

-- Jecel
 

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/self-interest/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     self-interest-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/