<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 18px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); position: static; z-index: auto;"><div id="ygrp-mlmsg" style="font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif; position: relative;"><div id="ygrp-msg" style="line-height: 1.22em; z-index: 1;"><div id="ygrp-text" style="line-height: 1.22em; font-family: Georgia;"><div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.22em;">I'm not sure it would be appropriate ... it would at least require a new category of some sort at <a href="http://bibliography.selflanguage.org/" style="line-height: 1.22em;">http://bibliography.selflanguage.org</a>.</div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div>1) I think they provide great context, hinting at the great Platonic dream of which all these tools are but a shadow<div>2) These papers are gems and it is great to distribute them through as many channels as possible yet they be lost</div></body></html>