mail at russell-allen.com
Sat Jul 23 05:28:30 UTC 2016
I first used Squeak 1.x and the system browse was enough for me to discover the system. Modern Pharo scares me though. The tools haven't scaled.
Sent from my phone
> On 23 Jul 2016, at 2:06 PM, 'Jason Grossman' spam-me at xeny.net [self-interest] <self-interest at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> Yes, excellent.
> And then there's also stuff that's even more high level than that.
> For example, when I look through the object systems of Pharo or even the
> relatively small Io, I find a mixture of things that are intended for
> widespread use and things that are intended for niche uses, for lots of
> reasons (e.g. they're experimental, or they're optimised for only
> certain cases, or they're badly optimised but get correct results in
> corner cases, or they can talk to other obsolete systems, or ...). This
> can be shown in the internal documentation of the objects and sometime
> is (not always - grrr), but that's not where it's most useful, is it? I
> want to know before I start exploring which objects I should consider
> On 23 Jul 2016, at 14:01, David Ungar ungar at me.com [self-interest]
> > Sure, no argument there. Someone had written about parameter type
> > comments. Self objects and slots can have comments in their
> > annotations. Easy enough to write some reflective code to compile it,
> > search it, etc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Self-interest