[self-interest] Webserver updates

[Russell Allen]

On 08/10/2014, at 8:33 PM, "Chris Double chris.double at double.co.nz [self-interest]" <self-interest at yahoogroups.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Russell Allen mail at russell-allen.com
> [self-interest] <self-interest at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> >
> > Also, more experimentally, requests to servlets are unceremoniously killed if they haven't returned an answer in 30 seconds. Does this sound like a good idea? Should it be longer? Shorter? The aim is to stop broken processes clogging up the system.
> 
> How will this affect debugging servlets? Will the process be killed
> during a debugging session if it's longer than 30 seconds?
> 
Probably.
I'm not sure it's possible to distinguish between a process stuck on an error on the server and a process being debugged?
Easy solution is to bump up servletTimeout to some big number while debugging.
Can you think of a better solution?
> 
> -- 
> http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.selflanguage.org/pipermail/self-interest/attachments/20141008/0b7ea00a/attachment.html>