[self-interest] VM crashing, expected behavior?

[David Ungar]

Must be a trick question. 

- David (from iPad, typos likely)

On Aug 14, 2012, at 7:16 AM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Do you think that this code
> 
> (message copy receiver: [
> times delay: 300.
> benchmarks measurePerformance.
> ] Selector: 'value') fork resume.
> 
> should crash the VM?
> 
> Best
> -Tobias
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.selflanguage.org/pipermail/self-interest/attachments/20120814/ece2efe2/attachment.html>