[self-interest] Paper on Traits.

[Jan-Paul Bultmann]

Btw, David
may I humbly ask you on your thoughts on Io as a language ^^?
Another grab bag one, or maybe a worthy successor to Self if enhanced with its Environment ;)?

Cheers Jan
On Sep 25, 2011, at 01:12 AM, Jan-Paul Bultmann wrote:

> Hrhr,
> 
> This is exactly what I had expected :D set operations seemed a bit too dirty for Self.
> My mind must have been playing tricks on me remembering that ^^, but that unexpectedness was what made me curious.
> 
> Cheers Jan
> On Sep 25, 2011, at 00:52 AM, ungar at mac.com wrote:
> 
>>  
>> 
>> Dave has it right. We didn't need those operations; they constitute yet another programming language and clutter up the story. IMO.
>> Just refactor the traits so it's right. We weren't worried about black-box code.
>> 
>> - David
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 24, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Jan-Paul Bultmann wrote:
>> 
>>>  
>>> Kinda, thanks^^
>>> 
>>> Should have added though:
>>> I recall that there was some stuff on traits and set operations to compose them, like union and intersection.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Cheers Jan
>>> On Sep 24, 2011, at 23:41 PM, David Goehrig wrote:
>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> Does
>>>> 
>>>> http://selflanguage.org/_static/published/organizing-programs.pdf
>>>> 
>>>> Count?  
>>>> 
>>>> -=-=- dave at nexttolast.com -=-=-
>>>> 
>>>> On Sep 24, 2011, at 5:09 PM, Jan-Paul Bultmann <janpaulbultmann at me.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> Hey was there ever a Self specific paper on Traits?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers Jan
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.selflanguage.org/pipermail/self-interest/attachments/20110925/55683d91/attachment.html>