[self-interest] modules object and categories

[ungar at mac.com]

And thank you for finding the link. I may well have a pdf somewhere....

And here it is!




On Sep 6, 2011, at 11:02 AM, David Harris wrote:

> Thanks for the reference to your paper -- helps understanding very much :-) 
> 
> 
> Annotating Objects for Transport to Other Worlds
> 
> David
> 
> 
> On 6-Sep-11, at 9:52 AM, ungar at mac.com wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The organization reflects the semantics; they share a single name space. A hierarchy, paralleling the file system would be better. It's more than the modules object that is involved: the annotations and their UI, the module dictionary, and the transporter all would need fixing. It would be a great project for someone to tackle. The transporter is a fascinating system, if I do say so myself. There's an OOPSLA paper about it, by me: Transporting Objects to Other Worlds.
>> 
>> - David (from iPad, typos likely)
>> 
>> On Sep 6, 2011, at 2:16 AM, Mildred Ki'Lya <mildred593 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Wouldn't it be better if the modules in the "modules" object were organized by categories following the module hierarchy. Currently, all slots are on a flat list and it's difficult to find anything.
>>> 
>>> Mildred
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.selflanguage.org/pipermail/self-interest/attachments/20110906/fbff71ce/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/x-ygp-stripped
Size: 176 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.selflanguage.org/pipermail/self-interest/attachments/20110906/fbff71ce/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.selflanguage.org/pipermail/self-interest/attachments/20110906/fbff71ce/attachment-0001.html>