[self-interest] modules object and categories
dpharris at telus.net
Tue Sep 6 18:02:23 UTC 2011
Thanks for the reference to your paper -- helps understanding very
Annotating Objects for Transport to Other Worlds
On 6-Sep-11, at 9:52 AM, ungar at mac.com wrote:
> The organization reflects the semantics; they share a single name
> space. A hierarchy, paralleling the file system would be better.
> It's more than the modules object that is involved: the annotations
> and their UI, the module dictionary, and the transporter all would
> need fixing. It would be a great project for someone to tackle. The
> transporter is a fascinating system, if I do say so myself. There's
> an OOPSLA paper about it, by me: Transporting Objects to Other Worlds.
> - David (from iPad, typos likely)
> On Sep 6, 2011, at 2:16 AM, Mildred Ki'Lya <mildred593 at gmail.com>
>> Wouldn't it be better if the modules in the "modules" object were
>> organized by categories following the module hierarchy. Currently,
>> all slots are on a flat list and it's difficult to find anything.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Self-interest