[self-interest] modules object and categories

[David Harris]

Thanks for the reference to your paper -- helps understanding very  
much :-)

Annotating Objects for Transport to Other Worlds

David


On 6-Sep-11, at 9:52 AM, ungar at mac.com wrote:

>
>
>
> The organization reflects the semantics; they share a single name  
> space. A hierarchy, paralleling the file system would be better.  
> It's more than the modules object that is involved: the annotations  
> and their UI, the module dictionary, and the transporter all would  
> need fixing. It would be a great project for someone to tackle. The  
> transporter is a fascinating system, if I do say so myself. There's  
> an OOPSLA paper about it, by me: Transporting Objects to Other Worlds.
>
> - David (from iPad, typos likely)
>
> On Sep 6, 2011, at 2:16 AM, Mildred Ki'Lya <mildred593 at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better if the modules in the "modules" object were  
>> organized by categories following the module hierarchy. Currently,  
>> all slots are on a flat list and it's difficult to find anything.
>>
>> Mildred
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.selflanguage.org/pipermail/self-interest/attachments/20110906/1e58d4e7/attachment.html>