[self-interest] have to get this off my heart
ungar at mac.com
ungar at mac.com
Wed Dec 29 00:00:11 UTC 2010
Sekhar,
There is a short Onward paper on Ly in the latest SPLASH/OOPSLA, but it doesn't cover the object model.
I was aiming for a simpler model at the expense of expressiveness. Something that would be as easy as possible to learn.
- David
On Dec 28, 2010, at 3:21 AM, Chandrasekhar Ramakrishnan wrote:
>
>
> 2010/12/26 <ungar at mac.com>
> Copy-down is a bit of a different matter. It sort of straddles programming time and run time, though only REFLECTIVE run-time.
> Maybe the folks at Vrije have a better way, or maybe Ly, my latest object system design is better. (I think so.)
> In Ly, all non-constant slots are copied-down, as part of the language.
>
> David,
>
> Could you say something about what prompted this change in Ly with respect to Self? What made you decide that it is preferable to have all non-constant slots copied down?
>
> Is there a paper on Ly?
>
> Regards,
>
> Sekhar
>
> --
> C. Ramakrishnan cramakrishnan at acm.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.selflanguage.org/pipermail/self-interest/attachments/20101228/55d504fd/attachment.html>
More information about the Self-interest
mailing list