simpler block story
Jecel Assumpcao Jr
jecel at merlintec.com
Wed Jan 21 18:21:51 UTC 2004
Below is the first design for blocks that I am not totally unhappy with.
Some of this could be used in Self but parts depend on the Neo
Smalltalk syntax rules to keep it visually similar to the current
system.
Instead of a special syntax for blocks, context (activation) objects
would understand the message [ ... ] with a method object as the
argument (the thing between "[" and "]") which would be like a Self
message "copyAsBlock: methObj".
While it would be possible to write
a [ b ]
in practice the '.[.]' message would always be sent to the implicit self
receiver (the currently executing context). Here is how this method
would be implemented (in a mix of Neo Smalltalk, Self and Smalltalk-80
notations for convenience)
.[.] = ( | :m. b |
b: block copyArity: m arity.
b context: thisContext sender.
b method: m.
b
)
The Smalltalk-80 notation "thisContext sender" could be replaced in Self
with just "self", except that might refer to the receiver of the
original method instead of the current one. It isn't important.
Supposing "m arity" is 2 (m takes two arguments), then "b" would be:
( | parent* = traits block.
context <- prototypes context.
method <- prototypes method.
value = (error: "needs 2 arguments").
value: arg = (error: "needs 2 arguments").
value: arg1 with: arg2 = (method runFor: context
With: arg1 With: arg2).
)
Obviously 'runFor:With:With:' should actually be something properly
reflective, but this should give the general idea.
The point is that this is all done with regular messages and objects
(blocks are not special in any way, though methods still are a little)
and actually exposes the way things are done in many Smalltalks (using
the "send blockCopy" bytecodes in Smalltalk-80, for example). Yet it
looks almost exactly the same and works almost exactly the same (the
only difference is that you can now send 'context' or 'method' to a
block) as the current solutions. How the implementation actually does
things, however, is an entirely different story...
-- Jecel
More information about the Self-interest
mailing list