Delegation and Self like things for Squeak
Stephen Pair
spair at yahoo.com
Thu Aug 23 02:46:01 UTC 2001
> I mentioned on the Squeak list some designs I have considered over
the
> years for this. I don't think a consumer quality system is possible
> without it. Things are simply not automatic enough.
I'd be interested in hearing those designs...I'm working on a design
myself...I've been reading the Kaehler's LOOM stuff and that's been
very helpful in identifying the things I need to watch out for. I'm
shooting for something that will make incremental persistence fast,
and will provide a commit primitive that will ensure everything is on
disk. Looks like the LOOM design would be expensive if you want to
make sure everything was saved (requiring a scan of object memory I
think).
Actually, I'm amazed that this hasn't been a higher priority with
SqC...you really can't consider Squeak as an OS without a solution in
this area. And, it's been done in so many other contexts...why not
Squeak? Makes me wonder if there's something I'm missing?
> > ....well, one has to have dreams. :)
>
> They are best when they are shared.
> -- Jecel
:)
- Stephen
More information about the Self-interest
mailing list