[self-interest] partial conclusions about design patterns
David.Ungar at Eng.Sun.COM
Mon Dec 4 23:26:23 UTC 2000
The difference is that I was talking about the redundancy of four patterns,
and your statement, Albertina, implies that I was talking about
Thus the difference is about 20 patterns.
At 2:06 PM -0200 12/4/00, Albertina Lourenci wrote:
>David Ungar wrote:
>Come on Dave! What's the difference between my statement and your
>In one of Albertina's recent messages, she stated that:
>>Jecel and Dave seems to state that all the abstractions
>>captured by the design patterns can be implemented perfectly
>>well in Self.
> I never intended to say this, nor do I understand how I could have
>seemed to say it.Perhaps Albertina was misled by my statement that
>all but one of the object creation patterns in GOF were redundant
>given a language like Self. - Dave--
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Self-interest