[self-interest] Re: Self bytecodes

[David Ungar]

Yup!

- Dave


At 10:17 PM -0400 5/31/99, Stefan Matthias Aust wrote:
>Another idea is to compile the self byte codes upon method activation into
>another set of instructions that is a bit more interpreter-friendly.  You'd
>get rid of all EXTEND instructions, would add the number of arguments for a
>method send and perhaps even introduce more codes for poping the stack or
>to translate ifTrue:IfFalse: or whileTrue: methods to jumps (even if that
>shouldn't be done in Self).
>
>bye
>--
>Stefan Matthias Aust // Truth Until Paradox!
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>eGroups Spotlight:
>"All Things US Navy" - US Naval discussion about navy people,
>veterans, places, events, history, and current events.
>http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/184
>
>
>eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/self-interest
>http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications

 

     David Ungar
     Sun Microsystems Laboratories
     (650) 336-2618

------------------------------------------------------------------------

eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/self-interest
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications